Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alexander Scipio's avatar

For a guy ostensibly worried about “muh democracy,” he sure issues alot of EO rejecting its every premise.

Expand full comment
WillyJP's avatar

Diane: Have been curious about this point for a long time: How was it that Washington only ended up with 29% Federal Land while Oregon has 53%?? They began as the Oregon Territory, and Oregon split off as a state first (1859) while Washington didn't achieve statehood until 1889 (30 years later!). Did it have something to do with that? With all it's military preserves (Oregon has virtually none), 3 National Parks to Oregon's 1 and the Forest Service virtually beginning there with Gifford Pinchot, it would seem that Washington ought to have a much higher percentage of Federal Land than Oregon. But instead it's just the reverse of what my limited knowledge of history would seem to suggest. How did that happen?? My only guess would be that E. Washington perhaps has a higher percentage of usable agricultural land than Oregon so more of it went into private farms? Seems like a very significant difference (29 v 53) to me however. Do you have any clue to that??

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts