3 Comments

I doubt that Tucker's coverage of AOC was the issue. Here's my theory: Twenty years ago, Fox was the up-and-coming small network that was peeling conservatives and many moderate viewers away from the rabid-Left big boys: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and so forth. Fox had graduated from the "first they ignore you" phase and had entered the "then they ridicule you" phase, and so the MSM routinely referred to Fox as "Faux News", if you remember. Then when Fox eclipsed the MSM's ratings, they stopped laughing. MSM then shifted gears and started openly declaring Fox a menace to society; that's the phase we're in now. But instead of Fox entering the final phase ("finally they emulate you") we are witnessing the opposite: Fox must now emulate the MSM that it spent decades defeating. The problem is the advertisers. For Fox to maintain growth, it must have LOTS of BIG advertisers. EXAMPLE: One of the largest advertising categories on TV now is the pharmaceutical industry; if you're going to expose Big Pharma's crimes against humanity, Big Pharma obviously won't be advertising with you. Additionally, someone at Fox probably made the calculation that Fox had reached the limit of its growth with conservative Americans, and that in order to grow further Fox must become more mainstream. But Tucker was wanting to move in the opposite direction: he was working on just the tip of the iceberg and was drilling deeper. Well, drilling deeper was not going to sit well with the majority of corporate America, which is thoroughly in bed with the DemokkkRATs, the CCP (China is their primary growth market), and the WEF. And that is why Tucker and Fox had to part ways. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/05/why_tucker_carlson_was_doomed.html

Expand full comment

Tucker is a National Treasure as is Bill O’Reilly!

Expand full comment

The truth no longer has a place in our society. What a shame! I am watching the destruction of the country that I love and there isn't much I can do about it.

Expand full comment