21 Comments
May 14Liked by Diane L. Gruber

Only evil men of Joe Biden’s stature are prepared to destroy their nation and its institutions to rule what’s left of their country. What’s just as evil and worrisome is that certain members of the legal profession, sworn to uphold the rule of law, support this ideological coup destroying our institutions.

Expand full comment

Diane I restacked this with Colonel John Mills to listen tomorrow. He was at DOD when these scum concocted the fake Russia thing. I know he thinks highly of John Eastman. We had a chief Justice (appeals) in my family, Irving Kaufman. He’s probably rolling in his grave. Never thought I would see all of this happening.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Corinne! I know a lot of deceased judges and attorneys who are rolling over in their graves. If Democrats remain in charge of the WH until January 2029, we will see a whole lot of Trump supporters jailed.

Expand full comment
May 14Liked by Diane L. Gruber

On Thursday Election Security on Rumble at @sternamerican. It’s on ColonelRETJohn feed. Quite a few people. I can’t take a picture to place it on here. Picture is on his feed

Expand full comment

He’s on and I think he’s doing it.

Expand full comment
May 14Liked by Diane L. Gruber

Well then we have work to do. We must make certain they do not. I do believe that the tide is turning in our favor. Thank you Diane for what you are doing.

Expand full comment

I just asked him to restack it. I tried but not having any luck doing it.

Expand full comment

Do you know who still has his bar license? That's right, the Prick (Kevin Clinesmith) who doctored the email showing Carter Page as not being a CIA asset, and we all know Comey put him up to it.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, and Comey, Stzok, McCabe, Bill & Hill, Barry still have theirs. Michelle was disbarred long before she lived in White House m

Expand full comment

Shakespeare also penned “let’s kill all the lawyers” in one of his plays. He recognized that lawyers existed to keep society in check. It was not suggested because lawyers are so disgusting. Of course we do observe that there are disgusting lawyers as there are disgusting other members of our society. Lawyers should keep abreast of bad lawyers and strip them of their ability to practice!

Expand full comment
author

The legal profession is self-regulating. What Democrats are doing to Trump's attorneys has nothing to do with that. Democrats are terrorizing the whole legal profession: Don't take clients we don't like or we will come after YOU.

Expand full comment

I’m excited to hear this podcast. I have no faith in any systems anymore, most of all the legal system. I have never seen it work how it should, time and again shitty people get away with shitty things. Today, it’s worse than anyone could have ever imagined, unless they are communists seeking to destroy and overthrow, then they are probably ecstatic.

Expand full comment
author

I have been on Connecting The Dots 3 times before. A little nervous about this one because I got such short notice and we are traveling. Last night's motel had VERY poor internet, tonight's motel has NO internet. Can't do the research I want to do. Had to go to a restaurant just to publish that "article."

Expand full comment

Thank you for highlighting this. I watched the John Eastman trial and it removed any doubt that our judicial system has been captured. Judge Roland was the most outwardly biased judge I’ve ever witnessed,

Frequently showing disdain and irritation to the Eastman’s lawyers and witnesses. When one expert on election integrity was called – my friend John Droz – she called for his expert status to be revoked due to some error or mistake on the timing of declaring him as an expert. She could have easily declared him an expert herself but refused. This meant that much of the evidence he was going to present was no longer admissible. This was in despite of the fact she had just declared a lowly election office manager to be an expert. Unbelievable.

This double standard resulted in a very lopsided presentation of evidence, akin to the J6 commissions findings. She also had no idea what key aspects of the election process were – like the edison machines – yet felt confident to challenge and dismiss aspects about them. I could go on and on with this one…

Expand full comment
author

You watched the trial? On YouTube?Could you please send the link to me? We are traveling from Oysterville to Custer right now and I have not had time to research more thoroughly what they did to Eastman.

Expand full comment

Here is a substack 2 part series written by John Droz - it highlights his experience as well as mentions the conservative lawyer who provided the best coverage overall.

1. https://open.substack.com/pub/criticallythinking/p/in-defense-of-john-eastman-part-1

Expand full comment

I was given a special link to view it live. I will see if I can get more info. Stay tuned…

Expand full comment
author

Live? WOW! How long ago?

Expand full comment